Why designers can’t think
Michael Bierut
Process vs. Portfolio Schools
Process schools favor a form driven problem-solving approach
Drawing letterforms
Translating objects into marks
Basic photography
Combining typography with illustrations & photographs
Creating communication using various combinations of acquired skills
Process schools attempt to duplicate Swiss/Basel teaching methods
Portfolio schools provide students with books that will get them jobs upon graduation
Product is more important than process
Portfolio teachers are impatient with idle exercises meaningless to the “real world”
Portfolio schools view the Swiss method as hermetic, arcane, and meaningless to the public
Process schools view portfolio methods as distastefully commercial, shallow, and derivative
Both process schools & portfolio schools value the visual aesthetic of graphic design
Some designers fill in educational gaps as they progress, some fake it
Mediocre design is a result of concentration on the visual
Every problem has a purely visual solution that exists outside and cultural context
The client must be touched with communication that is resonant, not self referential
Exposure to a meaningful range of culture would benefit graphic design students
I Come to Bury Graphic Design
Kenneth Fitzgerald
Procreation: assuring the creation of more professional design
The faster you go, the closer you get and the more weighed down you become
We seek a society where everyone is making art, being creative.
Increasing access to the means of production + desire
Design has a death wish
“In Search of the Perfect Client:’ Michael Bierut suggested we might have to psychologically condition future employers from childhood
Isn’t there a disconnect between advocating the free flow of information but allowing only a clique of specialists to direct it?
Design is an on-the-job learning experience
Students enter with a vague interest in text and image—often, not even that—and are channeled wholesale into professional design making
A successful design program is defined as one that (re) produces more professional design and designers
“Graphic Design is not a Profession”
“Can studying design be of general, not just professional, interest?”
“Do we really have anything to offer outside of the sometimes questionable promise of a job?”
The majority of design students will not go into professional practice
Does design care about anything other than producing more designers?
An education through design rather than in design should be our goal
Design is just a job to most of its practitioners
The majority of studios and corporate art departments are factories
The simple truth is that professional design will almost always fall short of touching hearts because it’s second-hand love
Designer’s love doing design, the client is just a vehicle
Why else do designers have creative side projects, as they describe it, to gratify their creative urges?
Shouldn’t this tell them that they’re in the wrong business?
Or that design shouldn’t be a business?
This does not mean, however, that designers must only do design
Maybe design should be left to people inspired by the nutrition labels on food packages
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment